106 acres
Her father’s will left Nancy the farm on which she was already living.
In Jacob’s will1777–1864
Widowed for more than forty years, Nancy inherited the Washington County farm where she already lived and was still recorded as a “Proprietor” at age 83.
Meet Nancy ↓
Nancy Buxton’s older gravestone appears to place her birth on February 14, 1777. She married Cornelius Boles, whose surname also appears as Boyles, Bowles and Boyle, and they made their home in Washington County, Pennsylvania. [1]
Cornelius died in 1821, leaving Nancy a widow with a family and an estate to settle. His probate papers give us unusually personal glimpses of what followed. Nancy participated in the settlement and appears among the purchasers of household property at the estate sale. [2]
But Nancy’s story did not end with Cornelius.
In 1836, her father, Jacob Buxton, unmistakably identified her in his will as “my well beloved daughter Nancy Boles.” He left her $500 and the 106-acre farm where she was already living. [3]
Nearly twenty-five years later, the census found Nancy in her own Washington County household. She was 83 years old and recorded as a “Proprietor,” with real and personal property of her own. [4]
Nancy died April 19, 1864, at age 87, according to her newer cemetery marker. [5]
He names Nancy as his daughter in his will.
Mother · working reconstructionMaiden name unproved. Jacob’s will names Hannah as his wife; it does not directly state Nancy’s maternity.
HusbandHis estate identifies Widow Nancy.
Child named in Cornelius’s estate“Jacob his son.” Nancy’s maternity is not directly stated in this account. A profile awaits more research.
John Boles remains a proposed family connection. That question is still open.
February 14 is the current reading of Nancy’s older gravestone. The worn inscription still needs confirmation.
See the recordCornelius dies; Nancy becomes a widow. His estate papers survive in Washington County, Pennsylvania.
See the recordAccounts, purchases and Nancy’s widow’s allowance show the estate being settled.
See the recordJacob Buxton’s will leaves “my well beloved daughter Nancy Boles” $500 and the 106-acre farm on which she already lives.
See the recordThe census records Nancy at 83, heading her own household with real and personal property.
See the recordCornelius’s estate papers contain the usual assortment of debts, accounts and property sales. And then I noticed something.
Widow Nancy was buying household furniture.
Including what appears to be a dresser.
Her husband dies and apparently probate says, “Sorry for your loss. Would you like to buy your dresser?”
Nancy: Dad.
Because her father, Jacob Buxton, was right there involved with the estate administration.
Genealogy occasionally gives you names and dates. Every once in a while, it gives you an entire family dynamic over a piece of furniture.
Estate inventories and sales followed contemporary probate practices, so this should not be interpreted as proof that Nancy personally lost legal ownership of a particular dresser. The records do document her participation as a purchaser during the settlement of Cornelius’s estate. The imagined exchange above is Sandy’s commentary. Inspect the sale entries.
Her father’s will left Nancy the farm on which she was already living.
In Jacob’s willJacob also left her five hundred dollars, in addition to what she had previously received.
Read the bequestAt 83, Nancy headed her own household. The census reports about $4,715 in real estate and $230 in personal estate.
In the 1860 censusFrom Cornelius’s death in 1821 to Nancy’s in 1864: more than four decades a widow.
The surviving datesA local history published in 1894 remembered Hannah as a community “doctress,” knowledgeable about medicinal roots and herbs. That is a later account, not independently verified medical fact; Hannah’s maternal relationship to Nancy remains part of the working reconstruction.
Read the historical accountOpen a record to see what it says, how we use it, and where questions remain.
Names “my well beloved daughter Nancy Boles,” wife Hannah, and children Jacob, Sarah Grimes and Aaron. Gives Nancy $500, the 106-acre farm where she already lived, and whatever she had previously received. The four named children need not be a complete roster. The available image is a typed transcription, which should be compared with the original handwritten will.
View record / image ↗
Identifies Nancy in the estate administration and includes Jacob Buxton among the signers. Cornelius was deceased by late September 1821. The papers retain the Boyles spelling.
View record / image ↗
Nancy Boyles signs by mark as widow in a receipt for an allowance during Cornelius’s estate settlement. The records show her participation in the proceedings.
View record / image ↗
Nancy and Jacob Buxton appear among purchasers. Household furniture includes entries read as bureaus or dressers. These purchases do not establish Nancy’s prior legal ownership of a particular item, or that she lost every household possession.
View record / image ↗
The shoe-repair account explicitly identifies Jacob as Cornelius’s son. It does not explicitly identify Nancy as Jacob’s mother, and it does not name John as a son.
View record / image ↗
Nancy Boles is recorded in her own household, age 83, as “Proprietor,” with approximately $4,715 real estate and $230 personal estate. The entry does not prove this was the identical 106-acre parcel, nor establish relationships to nearby Boles households.
View record / image ↗
The weathered stone identifies Nancy as Cornelius’s wife and appears to give February 14, 1777 as her birth date. That exact reading remains provisional; the broad 1777 birth year fits the other reported ages.
View record / image ↗
Clearly records Nancy Boles, died April 19, 1864, aged 87 years. This is a later marker; its reported death date and age remain attributed to it.
View record / image ↗
Reports Jacob’s death May 25, 1836, age 86, and Hannah’s death July 20, 1842, age 89. Remembers Hannah as a community “doctress” knowledgeable about roots and herbs. The supplied excerpt is a later reprint; the healing account is tradition, not independently verified medical evidence.
View record / image ↗
John, born in Pennsylvania in 1807, fits the proposed family geographically and chronologically. The surrounding research supports continued investigation, but no located record directly identifies him as Cornelius and Nancy’s son.
Cornelius Boyles’s 44-page estate packet has been reviewed and no reference to John was found. That negative search is recorded so we do not repeat it; it does not prove John was unrelated.
Follow the question at the Research Desk · Meet John — proposed connectionYoung is a lead in secondary material supplied in Sandy’s research. Its underlying primary evidence still needs confirmation. Hannah keeps her established display name here; the surname has not been accepted as fact.